It seems that the band wagon or hate beast is back in session.


I seems people will read what they want and do not read what is sasid.

My comment is not about the player it is about a team that has a history under Gilmour of not playing rookies and therefore not developing them.

2009 Alan Quine 2nd overall pick how much ice time and development did he get
2010 Alex Gubrandson how much ice time and development did he get
2011 Domi (even his dad did not wnat him near Gilmour) and traded for 3rd overall pick Kujawinski
2012 McKeown and Bennett Give credit to Gill for Bennett
2013 Crouose Gill gave him the minutes and let him play and learn
2014 O'Grady little ice time.

Then there is Franky P they don't play develop him and when the other goalie bails they have to use him and Gilmour dumps n the kid.

All I am saying is that it seems that history n Kingston may be repeating itself.

No matter what age if the kid has the chops to make the Team then they should play him.
There is nothing wrong with splitting Mckeown's minutes so that he plays with 2 partners.

But look at Watson another example they keep him and he rides the bench or the press box when he is fit to play.

Believe me or not if there were examples of a system for developing D in Kingston history i would use it.